I was addressing Andrea's topic of why Murtha got a lot of attention for speaking out on the war and Lieberman, in her words, got "ignored" for his most recent comments in suport of the war. I was trying to point out why that was -- that one was far more newsworthy than the other by an objective standared. And why the maverick Lieberman did get attention when he did speak out during Clinton's affair.
If you disagee with my argument, that's fine. Tell me why. But I don't think anything I wrote had anything to do with distorting facts or leaving some of them out or the poll you posted.