so I read this article and then had some immediate questions
Why is the Navy concerned about his media exposure when they didn't seem at all concerned about media exposure in the case against Lt. Ledford and his men? (other than the obvious that the Navy was prosecuting in that one) though still, or was the Navy concerned the Lt would be found guilty and the Navy wanted some distance? and the photos were already out?
Now here,I'm wondering why the Navy had intervened twice on the mans behalf, in a murder charge? Do you think it's b/c he's Dev Group?
or do you think the Navy has their own take on the actual events here?
And is the "no faces" policy to protect him in the event he's found innocent?
Thanks for your thoughts!